REFORMULASI LITMAS INTEGRASI SEBAGAI PENGUATAN KINERJA PEMBIMBING KEMASYARAKATAN DI BALAI PEMASYARAKATAN: STUDI PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA DENGAN AMERIKA SERIKAT
Keywords:
Litmas Integrasi, Reformulation, Comparative Law, Presentence Investigation ReportAbstract
This study aims to analyze the comparison between the format and substance of Community Research Reports (Litmas Integrasi) in and the Presentence Investigation Report in, as well as to formulate a reformulation model to strengthen the performance of Probation Officers at Correctional Centers. The novelty of this research lies in the comparative legal approach between the Indonesian correctional social report system and the United States system as a basis for simplifying and standardizing Litmas Integrasi. This study employed normative legal research using a comparative approach. Data were collected through document studies, literature reviews, interviews, and questionnaires involving 19 Probation Officers at Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Surabaya. The data were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively by comparing the structure, substance, and effectiveness of both reporting systems. The findings indicate that Litmas Integrasi in Indonesia remains lengthy, descriptive, and contains repetitive information that is less relevant to reintegration decision-making. In contrast, the Presentence Investigation Report in the United States is more standardized, concise, systematic, and based on objective parameters, making it more effective in supporting decision-making processes. Therefore, the reformulation of Litmas Integrasi is necessary through simplifying the report structure, strengthening analytical substance, and developing more measurable assessment indicators to improve the effectiveness and quality of Probation Officers’ performance.
References
Undang Undang
Undang undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 8: Probation and Pretrial Services, Pt. D: Presentence Investigation and Report (Washington, D.C.: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, t.t.), Bab 3 h.1,2.
Jurnal
Arto, Budi. “Perubahan Perilaku Narapidana dengan Pembinaan Community-Based Treatment di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIB Terbuka Ciangir.” Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi 8, no. 1 (Juni 2024): 20. https://doi.org/10.36080/djk.3058.
Codingest. “Mengenal Lebih Dalam Peran PK: Tak Hanya Pendamping Anak, Tapi Mitra Strategis Pembangunan Sosial.” Ditjenpas. Diakses 29 Mei 2026. https://www.ditjenpas.go.id/mengenal-lebih-dalam-peran-pk-tak-hanya-pendamping-anak-tapi-mitra-strategis-pembangunan-sosial.
Dm, Mohd Yusuf, Sri Heri Perwitasari, Rehulina Manita, Tengku Raisya Lopi, dan Geofani Milthree Saragih. Efektivitas Penerapan Hukum Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. 5, no. 2 (2023).
Falsafia, Nuansa. “Analisis Penggunaan Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman Tahun 2020.” Jurnal Restorasi Hukum 5, no. 2 (Desember 2022). https://doi.org/10.14421/jrh.v5i2.2386.
Ilmi, Maulana, Lita Ariani, dan Dicky Listin Quarta. “Pengaruh Beban Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pada Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan BAPAS Kelas 1 Banjarmasin.” Jurnal Psikologi 1, no. 4 (Juli 2024): 13. https://doi.org/10.47134/pjp.v1i4.2920.
Surbakti, Daniel Leonardo, dan Umar Anwar. Penelitian Kemasyarakatan (Litmas) Terhadap Asimilasi Narapidana Pada Bapas Kelas I Palembang. (Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai) 5, no. 2 (2023).
Wijaya, Trio Sandra, Muhamad Adystia Sunggara, dan Universitas Pertiba. Kesenjangan Implementasi Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dalam Proses Restorative Justice bagi Pelaku Dewasa dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan. 19, no. 3 (2025).
Website
Codingest. “Mengenal Lebih Dalam Peran PK: Tak Hanya Pendamping Anak, Tapi Mitra Strategis Pembangunan Sosial.” Ditjenpas. Diakses 29 Mei 2026. https://www.ditjenpas.go.id/mengenal-lebih-dalam-peran-pk-tak-hanya-pendamping-anak-tapi-mitra-strategis-pembangunan-sosial.
“Praktik Berbasis Bukti.” Diakses 29 Mei 2026. https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/probation-and-pretrial-services/evidence-based-practices.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Roubin Justice: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







